Aira

The Five Aira Sub-Products

Settlements, Estate, Evidence, Compliance Bundles, Compliance Reports — what each one is, who buys it, and which problem it solves.

Aira ships five distinct sub-products on top of the same core primitives (receipts, signatures, the policy engine). Different buyers, different moments of use. This page is the canonical reference — every dashboard subtitle, every landing-page card, and every SDK example uses the same one-liner from the table below.

The taxonomy

Sub-productOne-line taglinePrimary buyerWhen you reach for it
SettlementsTamper-evident batches that anchor recent receipts to a public, queryable log.Engineers, technical auditorsContinuous, automatic — Aira does it for you
EstateLifecycle for individual agents — wills, ownership transfers, certified shutdowns.Agent operators, governance teamsWhen an agent retires, transfers ownership, or sunsets
EvidenceCurated bundles of specific receipts assembled for a single legal request.Legal teams (reactive, on subpoena)When someone formally asks for proof of a specific incident
Compliance BundlesCryptographic snapshot of every receipt in a period, mapped to a regulatory framework. Machine-readable, offline-verifiable.Compliance officers, internal auditorsPeriodic — month-end, quarter-end, year-end
Compliance ReportsSame data as a bundle, rendered as a regulator-ready PDF. The document a regulator opens.Regulators, board members, external auditorsWhen you need to hand someone a document they can read

The conceptual split

Settlements   → infra-level proof (batch anchoring of receipts)
Estate        → agent lifecycle (wills, succession, shutdowns)
Evidence      → legal discovery (one request, specific receipts)
Compliance ─┬─ Bundles → cryptographic evidence (machine-readable JSON)
            └─ Reports → human-readable document (PDF)

How they relate

Receipts are the atomic unit. Every other sub-product is a different view or lifecycle layer over receipts:

  • Settlements group receipts into batches and anchor each batch. Every receipt eventually belongs to exactly one settlement.
  • Compliance Bundles select receipts by date range and framework, then commit the set to a Merkle root that auditors can verify offline.
  • Compliance Reports take the same selected set and render it as a PDF for human readers. Reports and Bundles are two views of the same data — bundles for machines, reports for humans. Most teams produce both.
  • Evidence Packages select receipts by case (a specific lawsuit, inquiry, internal investigation) — not by date range. They're curated by an operator, sealed, and exported.
  • Estate records agent-lifecycle events as their own receipts so the audit trail covers wills, ownership transfers, and shutdowns the same way it covers tool calls.

Which one do you need?

If you're being asked…Reach for
"Prove these receipts haven't been tampered with"Settlements (built-in continuously)
"We're being sued — give us all decisions related to customer X"Evidence
"Auditors are coming next week — they want the full Q1 record"Compliance Bundles
"The regulator wants a document for this period"Compliance Reports
"Agent retired — sign the death certificate"Estate
"What's the audit history of this one agent's lifecycle?"Estate

Ship-of-Theseus rule

If you only ever produce one of these, your audit trail is incomplete. Most regulated deployments end up using all five at different cadences:

  • Settlements runs continuously — you don't think about it.
  • Compliance Bundles is generated monthly and stored as your internal record.
  • Compliance Reports is generated on-demand from the same data when a regulator or board asks for the human-readable version.
  • Evidence is generated reactively when legal requests it.
  • Estate is updated when agents transition (rare but high-stakes).

The dashboard surfaces all five as siblings under the Agents section of the sidebar. Each has its own page; each page has the canonical one-liner above as its subtitle.

On this page